zapier improvements

[chiragchhatrala]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced form validation by switching from slug-based to ID-based checks, improving data integrity.
  • Introduced a new 'label' field in the form resource representation for clearer identification.

• Bug Fixes

  • Simplified form retrieval methods, reducing potential errors associated with slug ambiguities.

• Chores

  • Updated dynamic field reference in the Zapier integration for clearer user experience.
  • Adjusted integration tests to use ID-based identifiers for form validation.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Recent changes enhance the validation and retrieval processes within the Zapier integration requests by switching from using slug to id for form identification. This shift ensures greater reliability and performance. The FormResource has been improved to provide clearer data representation, including a new descriptive label. These refinements collectively enhance clarity and integrity in handling form data across the integration.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
app/Http/Requests/Integration/Zapier/PollSubmissionRequest.php, app/Http/Requests/Zapier/CreateIntegrationRequest.php, app/Http/Requests/Zapier/DeleteIntegrationRequest.php	Validation rules for form_id now check for id instead of slug, and the form() method has been simplified to use findOrFail() for better performance and clarity.
app/Http/Resources/Zapier/FormResource.php	The toArray method now correctly maps the id field and introduces a new label field, combining the resource's title and slug for enhanced output clarity.
integrations/zapier/triggers/new_submission.js	Updated dynamic field reference from 'list_forms.id.name' to 'list_forms.id.label' for improved clarity in form configuration.
tests/Feature/Zapier/IntegrationsTest.php, tests/Feature/Zapier/ListFormsTest.php	Updated tests to use form_id as id instead of slug, ensuring consistency and reliability in form identification across various requests and assertions.

Poem

🐇 In the fields where forms do play,
A rabbit hops with joy today!
From slugs to ids, a clearer way,
With labels bright, they guide our way.
Hooray for changes, robust and true,
A hop, a leap, for all that's new! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5049ba7 and 4a36ccd.

Files selected for processing (5)

• app/Http/Requests/Integration/Zapier/PollSubmissionRequest.php (1 hunks)
• app/Http/Requests/Zapier/CreateIntegrationRequest.php (2 hunks)
• app/Http/Requests/Zapier/DeleteIntegrationRequest.php (2 hunks)
• app/Http/Resources/Zapier/FormResource.php (1 hunks)
• integrations/zapier/triggers/new_submission.js (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (8)

app/Http/Resources/Zapier/FormResource.php (1)

15-17: LGTM!

The change to use id instead of slug improves data accuracy, and the addition of the label field enhances the descriptive output.

app/Http/Requests/Zapier/CreateIntegrationRequest.php (2)

16-16: Validation rule update approved.

Switching the validation to use id enhances reliability by ensuring the use of a unique identifier.

---

27-27: Improved form retrieval logic.

Using findOrFail() with form_id simplifies the logic and ensures efficient retrieval of the form.

app/Http/Requests/Zapier/DeleteIntegrationRequest.php (2)

16-16: Validation rule update approved.

The change to use id for validation ensures a more reliable and unique identifier.

---

27-27: Improved form retrieval logic.

The use of findOrFail() with form_id simplifies the logic and ensures efficient retrieval of the form.

app/Http/Requests/Integration/Zapier/PollSubmissionRequest.php (2)

21-21: Validation rule update approved.

Switching to use id for validation ensures a more reliable and unique identifier.

---

28-28: Improved form retrieval logic.

Using findOrFail() with form_id simplifies the logic and ensures efficient retrieval of the form.

integrations/zapier/triggers/new_submission.js (1)

40-40: Dynamic field reference update approved.

Changing the dynamic property to use label instead of name enhances clarity by providing a more descriptive identifier for form options.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a36ccd and a4ab79c.

Files selected for processing (2)

• tests/Feature/Zapier/IntegrationsTest.php (7 hunks)
• tests/Feature/Zapier/ListFormsTest.php (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

tests/Feature/Zapier/ListFormsTest.php (1)

25-29: LGTM!

The test assertions now correctly use the form id for identification, improving reliability. This aligns with the PR objectives.

tests/Feature/Zapier/IntegrationsTest.php (1)

26-26: LGTM!

The test cases now consistently use the form id for form identification across various operations, enhancing reliability and consistency. This aligns with the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 48-48, 67-67, 97-97, 125-125, 181-181, 232-232