Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix signature url issue #560

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

fix signature url issue #560

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Sep 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Expanded processing capabilities to include 'signature' field types alongside 'files' in form submissions.
    • Improved data handling for 'files' and 'signature' types, enhancing the overall functionality of form submissions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the conditional logic within the getCleanKeyValue and getFieldsWithValue methods of the FormSubmissionFormatter class. The updates expand the field type checks to include 'signature' alongside 'files', allowing both types to be processed similarly. This adjustment alters the control flow and may impact how data is handled and returned for these field types.

Changes

Files Change Summary
api/app/Service/Forms/FormSubmissionFormatter.php Expanded conditional logic in getCleanKeyValue and getFieldsWithValue to include 'signature' in addition to 'files'.

Poem

In fields of data, I hop and play,
With signatures and files, bright as day.
A change in logic, oh what a delight,
Processing both types, all feels just right!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For every new format brings bunnies near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d3733a and e1b895d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/app/Service/Forms/FormSubmissionFormatter.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
api/app/Service/Forms/FormSubmissionFormatter.php (2)

161-161: Approve the handling of 'signature' field types.

The change to include 'signature' alongside 'files' in the handling logic is a good practice for scalability and readability. Ensure that the data handling for 'signature' is consistent with that for 'files'.


237-237: Approve the expanded handling of 'signature' field types in getFieldsWithValue.

The inclusion of 'signature' alongside 'files' in the field handling logic is consistent with the changes in getCleanKeyValue. Verify that the output for 'signature' fields is appropriate and consistent with the handling of 'files'.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 6769da6 into main Sep 5, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the fix-signature-url-issue branch September 5, 2024 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants