Update build script #15
Conversation
* Add CodeQL
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes made in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai configuration |
CodeRabbit configurationlanguage: en-GB
tone_instructions: ''
early_access: false
enable_free_tier: true
reviews:
profile: chill
request_changes_workflow: true
high_level_summary: true
high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
auto_title_placeholder: '@coderabbitai'
review_status: true
poem: false
collapse_walkthrough: true
sequence_diagrams: true
changed_files_summary: true
labeling_instructions: []
path_filters: []
path_instructions: []
abort_on_close: true
auto_review:
enabled: true
auto_incremental_review: true
ignore_title_keywords: []
labels: []
drafts: false
base_branches: []
tools:
shellcheck:
enabled: true
ruff:
enabled: false
markdownlint:
enabled: true
github-checks:
enabled: true
timeout_ms: 90000
languagetool:
enabled: true
enabled_only: false
level: default
enabled_rules: []
disabled_rules:
- EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
enabled_categories: []
disabled_categories:
- TYPOS
- TYPOGRAPHY
- CASING
biome:
enabled: true
hadolint:
enabled: true
swiftlint:
enabled: true
phpstan:
enabled: true
level: default
golangci-lint:
enabled: true
yamllint:
enabled: true
gitleaks:
enabled: true
checkov:
enabled: true
detekt:
enabled: true
eslint:
enabled: true
rubocop:
enabled: true
buf:
enabled: true
regal:
enabled: true
actionlint:
enabled: true
pmd:
enabled: true
cppcheck:
enabled: true
semgrep:
enabled: true
circleci:
enabled: true
ast-grep:
packages: []
rule_dirs: []
util_dirs: []
essential_rules: true
chat:
auto_reply: true
knowledge_base:
opt_out: false
learnings:
scope: auto
issues:
scope: auto
jira:
project_keys: []
linear:
team_keys: []
pull_requests:
scope: auto
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/build.yml (4)
19-20: Appropriate permission added for CodeQLThe addition of the 'security-events: write' permission is crucial for the proper functioning of the CodeQL action. It's correctly scoped to the 'build' job, adhering to the principle of least privilege.
Consider updating the comment to be more specific:
security-events: write # required for github/codeql-action to upload resultsThis provides clearer context for future maintainers.
45-49: Excellent addition of CodeQL initializationThe introduction of the CodeQL initialization step is a significant enhancement to your CI/CD pipeline. It sets the foundation for automated code analysis, which can help identify potential vulnerabilities and improve code quality.
Consider adding the 'queries' parameter to customize the analysis:
- name: Initialize CodeQL uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 with: languages: java queries: security-and-qualityThis will run additional queries beyond the default ones, providing more comprehensive analysis.
54-56: Excellent addition of CodeQL analysis stepThe inclusion of the CodeQL analysis step completes the integration of automated code analysis into your CI/CD pipeline. This is a significant improvement that will help maintain code quality and security.
Consider adding a step to upload the SARIF results to GitHub's Code Scanning alerts:
- name: Upload SARIF results uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3 with: sarif_file: results.sarifThis will make the CodeQL results visible in the GitHub Security tab, enhancing the visibility and trackability of potential issues.
26-29: Minor indentation adjustment neededThere's a small indentation inconsistency in the 'Checkout' step. To maintain consistency with YAML best practices and improve readability:
Please adjust the indentation of the 'Checkout' step to use 6 spaces instead of 4:
steps: - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: token: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH }}This change will align with the standard indentation for steps within a job in GitHub Actions workflows.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/build.yml
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/build.yml (4)
12-12: Excellent adjustment to the pull request triggerLimiting the workflow to run only on pull requests targeting the 'main' branch is a sensible optimisation. This change aligns with best practices for GitHub Actions workflows and helps to conserve resources by avoiding unnecessary builds.
32-32: Excellent update to actions/setup-javaUpdating to actions/setup-java@v4 is a commendable change. It ensures that you're using the latest version of the action, which typically includes performance improvements, bug fixes, and potentially new features.
41-41: Beneficial update to Maven configurationThe addition of the '-ntp' (no transfer progress) option to the Maven configuration is a smart optimisation. This change will suppress download progress reports, resulting in cleaner CI logs and potentially faster build times.
This small adjustment contributes to the overall efficiency of your CI/CD pipeline.
Line range hint
1-65: Summary: Excellent enhancements to the build workflowThe changes made to this workflow file significantly improve your CI/CD process:
- The addition of CodeQL analysis enhances code security and quality.
- Updates to action versions (checkout, setup-java) ensure you're using the latest features and security patches.
- Optimisations like limiting PR triggers and adjusting Maven options improve efficiency.
These changes align perfectly with the PR objective of adding CodeQL to the build script, while also making other beneficial improvements.
To further enhance this excellent work, consider:
- Reviewing the use of PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH for an organisational repository.
- Adding SARIF results upload for better visibility of CodeQL results.
- Fine-tuning CodeQL queries for more comprehensive analysis.
- Addressing the minor indentation inconsistency.
Overall, this is a very positive update to your build workflow.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| token: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inappropriate use of PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH for GITHUB_TOKEN
The GITHUB_TOKEN should not be set to a personal access token. Please update the workflow to use the default GITHUB_TOKEN or a dedicated organisation-level token instead.
🔗 Analysis chain
Good update to actions/checkout, but consider token usage
Updating to actions/checkout@v4 is a positive change, keeping the action up-to-date with the latest features and security improvements.
The addition of the token parameter enhances security. However, using a personal access token (PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH) for an organisational repository might not be the best practice. Consider using GITHUB_TOKEN or a dedicated organisation-level token instead.
To verify the current token usage across the repository, run:
If this token is used consistently, consider opening a discussion about transitioning to a more appropriate token type for organisational use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH usage in workflow files
rg --type yaml 'PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 212
Summary by CodeRabbit
mainbranch.