Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: add commitments explainer #662

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2020
Merged

Docs: add commitments explainer #662

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2020

Conversation

decentclock
Copy link
Contributor

@AdamISZ This attempts to address your comment: #656 (comment).

I've essentially copy-pasted from the wiki, and added the following line at no. 47:

Note that whatever utxo you add has to have a scriptPubKey of the same type as those of your current wallet (currently either nested or native segwit). This also corresponds to the type of orderbook you interact with.

I also update the link to this document in USAGE.md

docs/SOURCING-COMMITMENTS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/SOURCING-COMMITMENTS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/SOURCING-COMMITMENTS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/SOURCING-COMMITMENTS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/SOURCING-COMMITMENTS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@decentclock
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kristapsk Thanks for the review. I'm sorry for the many mistakes I should have take a closer look at this.

@decentclock
Copy link
Contributor Author

All suggestions resolved

@AdamISZ
Copy link
Member

AdamISZ commented Aug 7, 2020

Thanks for the PR and thanks for the correction, to both of you.
I've read it and I believe it's correctly updated. Merging.

@AdamISZ AdamISZ merged commit 961ac90 into JoinMarket-Org:master Aug 7, 2020
@decentclock decentclock deleted the commitments-explainer branch August 7, 2020 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants