Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix network byte ordering of field table #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2022
Merged

fix network byte ordering of field table #58

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

tanmaykm
Copy link
Member

Integer fields in a field table should be transmitted with network byte ordering. This fixes read and write of field tables to enforce that.

fixes #57

Integer fields in a field table should be transmitted with network byte ordering. This fixes read and write of field tables to enforce that.

fixes #57
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #58 (2dd6f69) into master (5f3abd5) will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.17%   83.23%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1034     1038       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          860      864       +4     
  Misses        174      174              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/protocol.jl 88.19% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@nsslh
Copy link
Contributor

nsslh commented Aug 16, 2022

Looks good to me, thanks!

@tanmaykm tanmaykm merged commit 587dd12 into master Aug 16, 2022
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the tan/fix57 branch August 16, 2022 09:15
@mfalt
Copy link
Contributor

mfalt commented Aug 17, 2022

Could we tag a release for these bugfixes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Byte order for arguments
4 participants