Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor inferrability tweaks #59

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2020
Merged

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Member

@aviatesk aviatesk commented Dec 21, 2020

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #59 (be346e5) into master (2f4f2dc) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #59   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.57%   92.57%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         970      970           
=======================================
  Hits          898      898           
  Misses         72       72           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/codeedges.jl 94.76% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils.jl 83.33% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f4f2dc...3d6c2db. Read the comment docs.

- `@isssa`/`@isslotnum` hacks circumvent 
JuliaLang/julia#37342
  and gets rid of type assertions and accompanying inference overheads
  (I left type assertions themselves though, in order to make them work
  in older versions of Julia)
  NOTE: well, we won't need them once 
JuliaLang/julia#38905
  gets merged
- improve inferrability around `pcexec` within `selective_eval!`
@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 428c018 into JuliaDebug:master Dec 21, 2020
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the inferrabilitynerd branch December 21, 2020 14:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants