In `Tutorial on @snoop_llvm` the REPL outputs show various errors

[fingolfin]

If look at https://timholy.github.io/SnoopCompile.jl/dev/tutorials/snoop_llvm/ or https://timholy.github.io/SnoopCompile.jl/stable/tutorials/snoop_llvm/ you'll see this -- I am guessing the error is not what should be seen here (and luckily the example works for me).

And then subsequently

Maybe this shouldn't use @repl but rather jldoctest to avoid similar issues in the future?

[timholy]

Interestingly, it is using @repl: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/timholy/SnoopCompile.jl/refs/heads/master/docs/src/tutorials/snoop_llvm.md

I have a fix in #414

[fingolfin]

Apologies for any confusion, there were two typos in my issue report, I meant "Maybe this shouldn't use @repl but rather jldoctest"

[timholy]

It's a good suggestion. For SnoopCompile, doctests have been a pain in the neck, though: the problem there is that the timing threshold determines whether some are "in" or "out" and that means the result is unpredictable. If you set it to zero then it also may not be the best demo, since most people won't want that.

What I guess we want is basically a smoke test. We could, for example, copy this exact example into test/snoop_llvm.jl and at least make sure it runs. It's unfortunate that the results are so different between machines, though; I often struggle to replicate CI failures locally. #413 is but the latest example (that test works just fine on my machine using the same Julia version (EDIT: turns out it depends on coverage being on)).