-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reason for missing LinearAlgebra wrappers? #46
Comments
danielwe
changed the title
Reason for missing wrappers?
Reason for missing LinearAlgebra wrappers?
Jul 23, 2021
No reason, PRs welcome 🙂 |
danielwe
added a commit
to danielwe/Adapt.jl
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2022
Hermitian, UpperHessenberg, Bidiagonal, SymTridiagonal Closes JuliaGPU#46
maleadt
pushed a commit
to danielwe/Adapt.jl
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2023
Hermitian, UpperHessenberg, Bidiagonal, SymTridiagonal Closes JuliaGPU#46
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is there a reason the WrappedArray union omits some of the basic array wrappers from LinearAlgebra, specifically Symmetric, Hermitian, UpperHessenberg, SymTridiagonal, and Bidiagonal? I know at least symmetric and hermitian matrices have good CUSOLVER support (even if CUDA.jl doesn't wrap everything yet), so at least from the GPU perspective, I don't see an obvious reason why these wouldn't be treated the same as other wrappers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: