Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

issues with Gtk version 2 #63

Closed
jverzani opened this issue Feb 8, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

issues with Gtk version 2 #63

jverzani opened this issue Feb 8, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@jverzani
Copy link
Contributor

jverzani commented Feb 8, 2014

I know I need to update, but haven't. I find there are issues with the following:

  • in lists.jl the GtkCell bits
  • in theme.jl the CSS stuff

Those are easy enough for me to deal with, but the issue I don't know how to work around is in Gtk.jl where the cache is deserialized. I get:

ERROR: GtkCellViewI not defined
 in eval at no file
 in anonymous at /Users/verzani/.julia/Gtk/src/Gtk.jl:149
 in reload_path at loading.jl:146
 in _require at loading.jl:59
 in require at loading.jl:43
while loading /Users/verzani/.julia/Gtk/src/Gtk.jl, in expression starting on line 148

time to upgrade?

@vtjnash vtjnash closed this as completed in 28bc1ae Feb 8, 2014
@vtjnash
Copy link
Contributor

vtjnash commented Feb 8, 2014

I prefer to keep compatibility with Gtk+ 2

@jverzani
Copy link
Contributor Author

jverzani commented Feb 8, 2014

Thanks!

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jameson Nash notifications@github.comwrote:

I prefer to keep compatibility with Gtk+ 2

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/63#issuecomment-34550981
.

John Verzani
Chair, Department of Mathematics
College of Staten Island, CUNY
verzani@math.csi.cuny.edu

@tknopp
Copy link
Collaborator

tknopp commented Feb 9, 2014

While I agree that Gtk+ 2 compatibility should be preserved (sorry for not paying attention in my commit) I have to say that it will be kind of hard to cover all parts of Gtk+2 as there are many deprecated things that would have to be implemented. My personal view is that it is more important to make it very easy on Win/Mac to get the gtk3 libs than to put effort in implementing deprecated API.

@vtjnash
Copy link
Contributor

vtjnash commented Feb 9, 2014

I don't plan on covering any of the deprecated parts -- just maintaining basic compatibility.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants