More README changes #120
Closed
More README changes #120
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Make clearer and more specific LLVM support claims * Mention parallel testing
|
Oh, I hadn't seen https://github.com/JuliaComputingOSS/llvm-cbe/issues/119… maybe I should limit the LLVM claims further then. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I expect the LLVM part to be the controversial part. (#60 is relevant of course.) The codebase supposedly supports many older versions of LLVM, but I assume only the newer ones are actually being tested. I also don't want to put just one version down, because that also doesn't reflect actual use or what the code says.