Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

Tag Convex.jl v0.8.0 #19330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2018
Merged

Conversation

attobot
Copy link
Contributor

@attobot attobot commented Nov 5, 2018

Repository: JuliaOpt/Convex.jl
Release: v0.8.0
Travis: Travis Build Status
Diff: vs v0.7.0
requires vs v0.7.0:

--- 0.7.0/requires
+++ 0.8.0/requires
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-julia 0.6 0.7-
-MathProgBase 0.5 0.8
+julia 0.7
+MathProgBase 0.7 0.8
 DataStructures
-Compat 0.24

cc: @ararslan

Please make sure that:

  • CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
  • Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member

ararslan commented Nov 5, 2018

Do not merge yet. I'm investigating the failures on JuliaCIBot which were not marked as such.

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

Which failures? It is only marked as a overall failure if the status goes from passing to failing.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member

ararslan commented Nov 6, 2018

The SchattenNorms build on 0.7 shows issues related to vecnorm coming from Convex, which I'm addressing in jump-dev/Convex.jl#242. The "before" build shows N/A for SchattenNorms for 0.7, likely because the current Convex tag has an upper bound at 0.7.

@attobot
Copy link
Contributor Author

attobot commented Nov 6, 2018

Repository: JuliaOpt/Convex.jl
Release: v0.8.0
Travis: Travis Build Status
Diff: vs v0.7.0
requires vs v0.7.0:

--- 0.7.0/requires
+++ 0.8.0/requires
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-julia 0.6 0.7-
-MathProgBase 0.5 0.8
+julia 0.7
+MathProgBase 0.7 0.8
 DataStructures
-Compat 0.24

cc: @ararslan

Please make sure that:

  • CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
  • Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit 032930a into JuliaLang:metadata-v2 Nov 6, 2018
@attobot attobot deleted the Convex/v0.8.0 branch November 6, 2018 23:46
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants