Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When pushing to a GitHub repository, use HTTPS #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2016

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Member

@Keno Keno commented Aug 11, 2016

Since we can use the token we already have for API.
Also clean a couple deprecations.

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ const cd = Pkg.Dir.cd
Return package `pkg` directory location through search. Additional `paths` are appended.
"""
function dir(pkg::AbstractString)
pkgsrc = Base.find_in_path(pkg, Pkg.dir())
pkgsrc = Base.find_in_path(String(pkg), Pkg.dir())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this needed? shouldn't find_in_path be smart enough to handle this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, but I wouldn't have put it if there wasn't some deprecation warning that told me so. Though I was on an old version of PkgDev, so maybe this was already fixed and rebase put it back.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I suspect what happened is that I didn't have ca9fdc8

Since we can use the token we already have for API.
Also clean a couple deprecations.
@Keno
Copy link
Member Author

Keno commented Aug 11, 2016

I'm gonna go ahead and merge this. We should probably also tag a new version.

@Keno Keno merged commit a851618 into JuliaLang:master Aug 11, 2016
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Aug 11, 2016

Agreed. The tests from #58 might fail on PackageEvaluator, I'm not sure.

@Keno
Copy link
Member Author

Keno commented Aug 11, 2016

I think that's a fine trade-off. If it does, we'll fix it. Since other packages don't depend on this, we don't risk cascading failures.

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Aug 13, 2016

Did fail on PackageEvaluator: http://pkg.julialang.org/detail/PkgDev.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants