Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Stop setting force_noinline for function of union arguments (#27057)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The original motivation for setting force_noinline for functions
with union arguments seems to have been bugs in type intersection.
However, the type system has improved quite a bit and at least in
the test suites we don't seem to run into any issues. Thus, we can
stop setting force_noinline. Nevertheless, it still make since
to penalize functions with union arguments. Doing so encourages
union splits to happen at the call site, rather than having multiple
redundant union splits inside the function. However, for simple functions
of intrinsics and builtins it can make a lot of sense to inline
the union split signature.
  • Loading branch information
Keno authored Sep 14, 2020
1 parent 667ab89 commit 4c805d2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 24 additions and 14 deletions.
36 changes: 23 additions & 13 deletions base/compiler/optimize.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ function add_backedge!(li::CodeInstance, caller::OptimizationState)
nothing
end

function isinlineable(m::Method, me::OptimizationState, params::OptimizationParams, bonus::Int=0)
function isinlineable(m::Method, me::OptimizationState, params::OptimizationParams, union_penalties::Bool, bonus::Int=0)
# compute the cost (size) of inlining this code
inlineable = false
cost_threshold = params.inline_cost_threshold
Expand All @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ function isinlineable(m::Method, me::OptimizationState, params::OptimizationPara
end
end
if !inlineable
inlineable = inline_worthy(me.src.code, me.src, me.sptypes, me.slottypes, params, cost_threshold + bonus)
inlineable = inline_worthy(me.src.code, me.src, me.sptypes, me.slottypes, params, union_penalties, cost_threshold + bonus)
end
return inlineable
end
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -219,15 +219,14 @@ function optimize(opt::OptimizationState, params::OptimizationParams, @nospecial
replace_code_newstyle!(opt.src, ir, nargs)

# determine and cache inlineability
union_penalties = false
if !force_noinline
# don't keep ASTs for functions specialized on a Union argument
# TODO: this helps avoid a type-system bug mis-computing sparams during intersection
sig = unwrap_unionall(opt.linfo.specTypes)
if isa(sig, DataType) && sig.name === Tuple.name
for P in sig.parameters
P = unwrap_unionall(P)
if isa(P, Union)
force_noinline = true
union_penalties = true
break
end
end
Expand All @@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ function optimize(opt::OptimizationState, params::OptimizationParams, @nospecial
# For functions declared @inline, increase the cost threshold 20x
bonus += params.inline_cost_threshold*19
end
opt.src.inlineable = isinlineable(def, opt, params, bonus)
opt.src.inlineable = isinlineable(def, opt, params, union_penalties, bonus)
end
end
nothing
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -281,7 +280,9 @@ plus_saturate(x::Int, y::Int) = max(x, y, x+y)
# known return type
isknowntype(@nospecialize T) = (T === Union{}) || isa(T, Const) || isconcretetype(widenconst(T))

function statement_cost(ex::Expr, line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}, slottypes::Vector{Any}, params::OptimizationParams, error_path::Bool = false)
function statement_cost(ex::Expr, line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any},
slottypes::Vector{Any}, union_penalties::Bool,
params::OptimizationParams, error_path::Bool = false)
head = ex.head
if is_meta_expr_head(head)
return 0
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -314,6 +315,13 @@ function statement_cost(ex::Expr, line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}
# tuple iteration/destructuring makes that impossible
# return plus_saturate(argcost, isknowntype(extyp) ? 1 : params.inline_nonleaf_penalty)
return 0
elseif f === Main.Core.isa
# If we're in a union context, we penalize type computations
# on union types. In such cases, it is usually better to perform
# union splitting on the outside.
if union_penalties && isa(argextype(ex.args[2], src, sptypes, slottypes), Union)
return params.inline_nonleaf_penalty
end
elseif (f === Main.Core.arrayref || f === Main.Core.const_arrayref) && length(ex.args) >= 3
atyp = argextype(ex.args[3], src, sptypes, slottypes)
return isknowntype(atyp) ? 4 : error_path ? params.inline_error_path_cost : params.inline_nonleaf_penalty
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -362,10 +370,12 @@ function statement_cost(ex::Expr, line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}
return 0
end

function statement_or_branch_cost(@nospecialize(stmt), line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}, slottypes::Vector{Any}, params::OptimizationParams, throw_blocks::Union{Nothing,BitSet})
function statement_or_branch_cost(@nospecialize(stmt), line::Int, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any},
slottypes::Vector{Any}, union_penalties::Bool, params::OptimizationParams,
throw_blocks::Union{Nothing,BitSet})
thiscost = 0
if stmt isa Expr
thiscost = statement_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, slottypes, params,
thiscost = statement_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, slottypes, union_penalties, params,
params.unoptimize_throw_blocks && line in throw_blocks)::Int
elseif stmt isa GotoNode
# loops are generally always expensive
Expand All @@ -379,24 +389,24 @@ function statement_or_branch_cost(@nospecialize(stmt), line::Int, src::CodeInfo,
end

function inline_worthy(body::Array{Any,1}, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}, slottypes::Vector{Any},
params::OptimizationParams, cost_threshold::Integer=params.inline_cost_threshold)
params::OptimizationParams, union_penalties::Bool=false, cost_threshold::Integer=params.inline_cost_threshold)
bodycost::Int = 0
throw_blocks = params.unoptimize_throw_blocks ? find_throw_blocks(body) : nothing
for line = 1:length(body)
stmt = body[line]
thiscost = statement_or_branch_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, slottypes, params, throw_blocks)
thiscost = statement_or_branch_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, slottypes, union_penalties, params, throw_blocks)
bodycost = plus_saturate(bodycost, thiscost)
bodycost > cost_threshold && return false
end
return true
end

function statement_costs!(cost::Vector{Int}, body::Vector{Any}, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}, params::OptimizationParams)
function statement_costs!(cost::Vector{Int}, body::Vector{Any}, src::CodeInfo, sptypes::Vector{Any}, unionpenalties::Bool, params::OptimizationParams)
throw_blocks = params.unoptimize_throw_blocks ? find_throw_blocks(body) : nothing
maxcost = 0
for line = 1:length(body)
stmt = body[line]
thiscost = statement_or_branch_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, src.slottypes, params, throw_blocks)
thiscost = statement_or_branch_cost(stmt, line, src, sptypes, src.slottypes, unionpenalties, params, throw_blocks)
cost[line] = thiscost
if thiscost > maxcost
maxcost = thiscost
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion base/reflection.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ function print_statement_costs(io::IO, @nospecialize(tt::Type);
code === nothing && error("inference not successful") # inference disabled?
empty!(cst)
resize!(cst, length(code.code))
maxcost = Core.Compiler.statement_costs!(cst, code.code, code, Any[match.sparams...], params)
maxcost = Core.Compiler.statement_costs!(cst, code.code, code, Any[match.sparams...], false, params)
nd = ndigits(maxcost)
println(io, meth)
IRShow.show_ir(io, code, (io, linestart, idx) -> (print(io, idx > 0 ? lpad(cst[idx], nd+1) : " "^(nd+1), " "); return ""))
Expand Down

3 comments on commit 4c805d2

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Executing the daily package evaluation, I will reply here when finished:

@nanosoldier runtests(ALL, isdaily = true)

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your package evaluation job has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @maleadt

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please sign in to comment.