-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
push!, append! AbstractVector implementations no longer work on Julia 1.11+ #55459
Labels
arrays
[a, r, r, a, y, s]
Comments
mkitti
referenced
this issue
in JaneliaSciComp/UInt12Arrays.jl
Aug 11, 2024
Update BitIntegers.jl compat to 0.3, fix formatting and bugs
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 13, 2024
…55470) Fix #55459 In Julia 1.10, `push!` and `append!` would be functional for `AbstractVector` implementations if `resize!` and `setindex!` were defined. As of #51903 by @vtjnash as in Julia 1.11.0-rc2, `append!` now depends on an implementation of `sizehint!` and `push!`. Since `push!` also depends on `append!`, a stack overflow situation can easily be created. To avoid this, this pull request defines the following * Add generic versions of `push!(a::AbstractVector, x)` which do not depend on `append!` * Add default implementation of `sizehint!` that is a no-op The implementation of `push!(a::AbstractVector, x)` is a generic version based on the implementation of `push!(a::Vector, x)` without depending on internals. # Example for SimpleArray Consider the `SimpleArray` example from test/abstractarray.jl: ```julia mutable struct SimpleArray{T} <: AbstractVector{T} els::Vector{T} end Base.size(sa::SimpleArray) = size(sa.els) Base.getindex(sa::SimpleArray, idx...) = getindex(sa.els, idx...) Base.setindex!(sa::SimpleArray, v, idx...) = setindex!(sa.els, v, idx...) Base.resize!(sa::SimpleArray, n) = resize!(sa.els, n) Base.copy(sa::SimpleArray) = SimpleArray(copy(sa.els)) ``` Note that `setindex!` and `resize!` are implemented for `SimpleArray`. ## Julia 1.10.4: push! is functional On Julia 1.10.4, `push!` has a functional implementation for `SimpleArray` ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int,5)), 6) 6-element SimpleArray{Int64}: 0 0 0 0 0 6 ``` ## Julia 1.11.0-rc2 and nightly: push! requires sizehint! and is prone to stack overflow Before this pull request, on Julia 1.11.0-rc2 and nightly, `push!` fails for want of `sizehint!`. ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int,5)), 6) ERROR: MethodError: no method matching sizehint!(::SimpleArray{Int64}, ::Int64) The function `sizehint!` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types. ... ``` After implementing `sizehint!`, `push!` still fails with a stack overflow. ```julia-repl julia> Base.sizehint!(a::SimpleArray, x) = a julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int, 5)), 6) Warning: detected a stack overflow; program state may be corrupted, so further execution might be unreliable. ERROR: StackOverflowError: Stacktrace: [1] _append! @ ./array.jl:1344 [inlined] [2] append! @ ./array.jl:1335 [inlined] [3] push!(a::SimpleArray{Int64}, iter::Int64) @ Base ./array.jl:1336 --- the above 3 lines are repeated 79982 more times --- [239950] _append! @ ./array.jl:1344 [inlined] [239951] append! @ ./array.jl:1335 [inlined] ``` This is because the new implementation of `append!` depends on `push!`. ## After this pull request, push! is functional. After this pull request, there is a functional `push!` for `SimpleArray` again as in Julia 1.10.4: ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int, 5), 6) 6-element SimpleArray{Int64}: 0 0 0 0 0 6 ``` (cherry picked from commit cf4c30a)
lazarusA
pushed a commit
to lazarusA/julia
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2024
…uliaLang#55470) Fix JuliaLang#55459 In Julia 1.10, `push!` and `append!` would be functional for `AbstractVector` implementations if `resize!` and `setindex!` were defined. As of JuliaLang#51903 by @vtjnash as in Julia 1.11.0-rc2, `append!` now depends on an implementation of `sizehint!` and `push!`. Since `push!` also depends on `append!`, a stack overflow situation can easily be created. To avoid this, this pull request defines the following * Add generic versions of `push!(a::AbstractVector, x)` which do not depend on `append!` * Add default implementation of `sizehint!` that is a no-op The implementation of `push!(a::AbstractVector, x)` is a generic version based on the implementation of `push!(a::Vector, x)` without depending on internals. # Example for SimpleArray Consider the `SimpleArray` example from test/abstractarray.jl: ```julia mutable struct SimpleArray{T} <: AbstractVector{T} els::Vector{T} end Base.size(sa::SimpleArray) = size(sa.els) Base.getindex(sa::SimpleArray, idx...) = getindex(sa.els, idx...) Base.setindex!(sa::SimpleArray, v, idx...) = setindex!(sa.els, v, idx...) Base.resize!(sa::SimpleArray, n) = resize!(sa.els, n) Base.copy(sa::SimpleArray) = SimpleArray(copy(sa.els)) ``` Note that `setindex!` and `resize!` are implemented for `SimpleArray`. ## Julia 1.10.4: push! is functional On Julia 1.10.4, `push!` has a functional implementation for `SimpleArray` ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int,5)), 6) 6-element SimpleArray{Int64}: 0 0 0 0 0 6 ``` ## Julia 1.11.0-rc2 and nightly: push! requires sizehint! and is prone to stack overflow Before this pull request, on Julia 1.11.0-rc2 and nightly, `push!` fails for want of `sizehint!`. ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int,5)), 6) ERROR: MethodError: no method matching sizehint!(::SimpleArray{Int64}, ::Int64) The function `sizehint!` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types. ... ``` After implementing `sizehint!`, `push!` still fails with a stack overflow. ```julia-repl julia> Base.sizehint!(a::SimpleArray, x) = a julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int, 5)), 6) Warning: detected a stack overflow; program state may be corrupted, so further execution might be unreliable. ERROR: StackOverflowError: Stacktrace: [1] _append! @ ./array.jl:1344 [inlined] [2] append! @ ./array.jl:1335 [inlined] [3] push!(a::SimpleArray{Int64}, iter::Int64) @ Base ./array.jl:1336 --- the above 3 lines are repeated 79982 more times --- [239950] _append! @ ./array.jl:1344 [inlined] [239951] append! @ ./array.jl:1335 [inlined] ``` This is because the new implementation of `append!` depends on `push!`. ## After this pull request, push! is functional. After this pull request, there is a functional `push!` for `SimpleArray` again as in Julia 1.10.4: ```julia-repl julia> push!(SimpleArray{Int}(zeros(Int, 5), 6) 6-element SimpleArray{Int64}: 0 0 0 0 0 6 ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Implementing
Base.resize!
used to be sufficient forpush!
andappend!
to work on Julia 1.10 and prior.Consider the following
Vector
wrapper.Attempting to use
push!
would suggest the implementation ofresize!
:After implmenting
resize!
as follows,this allows
push!
to work on Julia 1.10.On Julia 1.11-rc2, this no longer works:
Following the suggestion, an implementation of
sizehint!
leads to StackOverflow error on Julia 1.11:As of #51903,
append!(a::AbstractVector, iter)
depends onpush!(a::AbstractVector, iter...)
. This is problematic becausepush!(a::AbstractVector, iter...)
depends onappend!(a::AbstractVector, iter)
which leads to the above stack overflow condition.julia/base/array.jl
Lines 1305 to 1329 in 786caaa
The new implementation of
append!
suggests that we should modify the generic implementation ofpush!
forAbstractVector
:Importantly, this new implementation of
push!
now only depends on theAbstractArray
interface and an implementation ofresize!
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: