-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
call
overloading needs documentation
#9680
Comments
I added some docs in 11ab1b3 ... does this solve the issue? |
The commit above does address the manual part. It would also be nice to have an entry in the |
Added to |
Jeff's initial comment on PR #8712 suggests that there is quite a few nifty things which can be done with the new call-feature, for instance his subarray example. Should this not be documented as well? |
Oops, I didn't manage to scroll down. So I'll need to update my comment! Sorry! OK, so here after properly finishing the read: The section in doc/manual/types.rst clears up the relation between constructors and conversion. But should it may go into doc/manual/constructors.rst? The new |
@JeffBezanson moved it to constructors.rst already. |
I think with closing the related #12242, this is also resolved. |
Merged PR #8712 came without documentation. Documentation is needed for:
call
itself, probably in the std-libconvert
. In particular constructors for abstract types,new{...}
,etcThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: