deprecate dict comprehension syntax. fixes #16510 #16561
Conversation
|
There are several uses of this remaining that didn't trigger deprecation warnings but should have: Also devdocs/ast.rst needs an update (and sphinx is complaining that it's currently malformed) |
|
That must be due to #10727, which I don't really agree with. |
|
Yeah, ref #10728 (comment), and it would be more useful if the various command-line flags were available as scoped in-language API's. |
|
Or people who want to build deprecated syntax into userimg could manually add the flag themselves, it seems like just honoring the command line flag would be enough there. |
|
Yes I think we should revert that change. Never getting warnings for Base because somebody once found them annoying is the wrong tradeoff. |
see discussion in JuliaLang#16561, deprecations should be flagged, found, and removed in base - if you need to include code with deprecations in userimg.jl, then add --depwarn=no manually when building that custom image
see discussion in JuliaLang#16561, deprecations should be flagged, found, and removed in base - if you need to include code with deprecations in userimg.jl, then add --depwarn=no manually when building that custom image
|
I think the only reason I haven't been bitten by this is that I usually make changes first, make sure that nothing breaks and only then add deprecations. Of course, that's gotten me in trouble too. |
see discussion in JuliaLang#16561, deprecations should be flagged, found, and removed in base - if you need to include code with deprecations in userimg.jl, then add --depwarn=no manually when building that custom image
|
Is there compat support for this yet? I guess this will need an entry in the |
No description provided.