Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix BigInt ndigits test #17952

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2016
Merged

fix BigInt ndigits test #17952

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2016

Conversation

JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

Just ran into this one on CI.

See #16766. ndigits(big(0),1) doesn't raise an error, but we were sometimes (randomly, rarely) testing that it does. This change makes the test reliable. The issue of how this case should actually behave is still open.

See #16766. `ndigits(big(0),1)` doesn't raise an error, but we were
sometimes (randomly, rarely) testing that it does. This change makes
the test reliable. The issue of how this case should actually
behave is still open.
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added the test This change adds or pertains to unit tests label Aug 10, 2016
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson merged commit 6154db2 into master Aug 11, 2016
@tkelman tkelman deleted the jb/ndigitstest branch August 11, 2016 04:08
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2016
See #16766. `ndigits(big(0),1)` doesn't raise an error, but we were
sometimes (randomly, rarely) testing that it does. This change makes
the test reliable. The issue of how this case should actually
behave is still open.

(cherry picked from commit dd09d19)
ref #17952
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test This change adds or pertains to unit tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants