Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] CI run for minimal-partr PR (3/3) #30731

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] CI run for minimal-partr PR (3/3) #30731

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Jan 16, 2019

No description provided.

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Windows precompile generator strikes again... Sorry :(

base/task.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
base/task.jl Show resolved Hide resolved

/* multiqueue parameters */
static const int16_t heap_d = 8;
static const int heap_c = 4;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the same as MULTIQ_HEAP_C ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is. Should I move to using #defines like MULTIQ_HEAP_C or leave this const?

@vtjnash vtjnash force-pushed the jn/kp/partr branch 2 times, most recently from 3ffbbb2 to df2a42c Compare January 22, 2019 22:10
@vtjnash vtjnash changed the title [WIP] CI run for minimal-partr PR [WIP] CI run for minimal-partr PR (3/3) Jan 25, 2019
kpamnany and others added 2 commits January 25, 2019 11:33
drop/fix more broken code
drop jl_thread_sleep_threshold deadcode
improve jl_wakeup_thread
@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

Superseded by #31398.

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the jn/kp/partr branch March 25, 2021 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
multithreading Base.Threads and related functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants