[release-1.0] Remove mention of a predicate function in strip docstring #31212
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`lstrip` and `rstrip` take a predicate function as the first argument. It seems `strip` did not receive that addition, though its docstring suggests that it did. See #31195.
ararslan
added
docs
|
I guess I should propose the same change against the release-1.1 branch? |
|
Wait, this was dumb. I should just make this change against master and mark it for backporting, then rebase #31211 atop that once that change lands on master. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
lstripandrstriptake a predicate function as the first argument. It seemsstripdid not receive that addition, though its docstring suggests that it did.See #31195. Companion to #31211.