Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤖 Bump the Tar stdlib from 1b63f2a to 0ba9683 #38755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020
Merged

🤖 Bump the Tar stdlib from 1b63f2a to 0ba9683 #38755

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020

Conversation

DilumAluthgeBot
Copy link
Contributor

Stdlib: Tar
Branch: master
Old commit: 1b63f2a
New commit: 0ba9683

$ git log --oneline 1b63f2a..0ba9683
0ba9683 extract: always chmod files on extraction (#88)
c50caef macOS: apparently Sys.isexecutable is not reliable (#87)
3ff3375 Windows extract: always chmod files (#85)
0e9d388 bump version to v1.9.0
ddca329 header.jl: fix some indentation (cosmetic)

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

@KristofferC, this really needs to be included on the 1.6 branch. Are we doing backports yet?

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

I don't think 1.6 has branched yet, right? IIUC, release-1.6 will be branched off of the last commit prior to the #38076 merge commit,

So IIUC, this PR will be included when release-1.6 is branched.

@DilumAluthgeBot DilumAluthgeBot deleted the BumpStdlibs/Tar-0ba9683 branch December 9, 2020 05:06
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2020
53 tasks
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2020
Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
(cherry picked from commit 409fa0a)
@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Looks like there was another PR merged the same day with what I presume is a newer version. This got backported so removing this one. Having this many stdlib bump PRs that get backport labels is pretty confusing and it increases the likelihood that the wrong one will be picked.

@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.6 Change should be backported to release-1.6 label Dec 11, 2020
@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

My suggestion is that there only ever be one open stdlib bump PR: JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl#31.

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

Yeah I think JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl#31 is the right way to go

ElOceanografo pushed a commit to ElOceanografo/julia that referenced this pull request May 4, 2021
)

Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants