-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inference: follow up #42529, handle an edge case in abstract_invoke
#42746
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JET reported: ```julia julia> report_package(JET) ... [toplevel-info] analyzing from top-level definitions ... 671/671 ═════ 12 possible errors found ═════ ... ┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:990 #self#(text, "top-level") │┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:990 JET.#report_text#124(JET.JETAnalyzer, JET.nothing, Base.pairs(Core.NamedTuple()), #self#, text, filename) ││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:993 res = JET.virtual_process(text, filename, analyzer′, config) │││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/toplevel/virtualprocess.jl:301 res = JET._virtual_process!(x, filename, analyzer, config, context, JET.VirtualProcessResult(actual2virtual, context)) ││││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/toplevel/virtualprocess.jl:432 res = JET._virtual_process!(toplevelex, filename, analyzer, config, context, res) │││││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/toplevel/virtualprocess.jl:637 JET.analyze_toplevel!(analyzer, src) ││││││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:1142 JET.#analyze_toplevel!#133(true, #self#, analyzer, src) │││││││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:1160 JET.analyze_frame!(analyzer, frame) ││││││││┌ @ avi-/JET/src/JET.jl:747 JET.typeinf(analyzer, frame) │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.lastindex), Nothing})): Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs))) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}})): fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}})::Int64)::Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1244 Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, 1) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Int64})): Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, 1) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── ... ```
b776be4
to
db93f25
Compare
vtjnash
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2021
LilithHafner
pushed a commit
to LilithHafner/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2022
…t_invoke` (JuliaLang#42746) JET reported: ```julia julia> report_package(JET) ... [toplevel-info] analyzing from top-level definitions ... 671/671 ═════ 12 possible errors found ═════ ... │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.lastindex), Nothing})): Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs))) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}})): fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}})::Int64)::Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1244 Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, 1) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Int64})): Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, 1) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── ... ```
LilithHafner
pushed a commit
to LilithHafner/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2022
…t_invoke` (JuliaLang#42746) JET reported: ```julia julia> report_package(JET) ... [toplevel-info] analyzing from top-level definitions ... 671/671 ═════ 12 possible errors found ═════ ... │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.lastindex), Nothing})): Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1243 fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs))) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}})): fargs′ = Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, Core.Compiler.:(3, Core.Compiler.lastindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}})::Int64)::Core.Compiler.UnitRange{Int64}) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── │││││││││┌ @ compiler/abstractinterpretation.jl:1244 Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs, 1) ││││││││││ for 1 of union split cases, no matching method found for call signatures (Tuple{typeof(Core.Compiler.getindex), Nothing, Int64})): Core.Compiler.getindex(fargs::Union{Nothing, Vector{Any}}, 1) │││││││││└─────────────────────────────────────────── ... ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JET reported: