Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle some cases of null Task in segv handling #42836

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2021

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Oct 28, 2021

I noticed this could be NULL in certain cases, which wasn't be handled previously. Also ensure we do not use round-robin sampling when printing a critical error, only for profiling.

Also ensure we do not use round-robin sampling when printing a critical
error, only for profiling.
@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Oct 29, 2021
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge merged commit ad607a2 into master Nov 1, 2021
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the jn/segv-null-task branch November 1, 2021 03:05
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Nov 1, 2021
@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Needs a manual backport for 1.7.

vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2021
Also ensure we do not use round-robin sampling when printing a critical
error, only for profiling.

(cherry picked from commit ad607a2)
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Also ensure we do not use round-robin sampling when printing a critical
error, only for profiling.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
Also ensure we do not use round-robin sampling when printing a critical
error, only for profiling.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants