Replace julia with Julia in faq when referring to the language.
#50103
Conversation
| @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ On the other hand, language *interoperability* is extremely useful: we want to e | |||
|
|
|||
| ### How does Julia define its public API? | |||
|
|
|||
| The only interfaces that are stable with respect to [SemVer](https://semver.org/) of `julia` | |||
| The only interfaces that are stable with respect to [SemVer](https://semver.org/) of Julia | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The language feels a bit weird here. Not your edits, but the sentence originally. Anything you can do to craft it better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well... I propose to totally write this section in #50105, but the scope of that is way larger than this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How does this sound?
Base and standard library functionality described in the documentation, which is not labeled as unstable (such as experimental and internal), is covered by SemVer." Functions, types, and constants are not part of the public API if they are not included in the documentation, even if they have docstrings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These are separate changes. I'm going to merge this as is, and do the reword in another PR
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#general-formatting-guidelines-for-julia-code-contributions