Implementing a string method that works for iterators and generators

[Priynsh]

fixes #57072 , allowing queries like
String(Iterators.map(c->c+1, "Hello, world"))
to work. also adds tests for the same :)

[jakobnissen]

You cannot guarantee that collected is an AbstractVector{<:AbstractChar}, even if it only contains Char.

Also, I'm not too fond of throwing a method error here. The method does exist, but the data may not be applicable. Consider an iterator that may return Char or Nothing. In this case, it will only throw a method error sometimes.

[KlausC]

What do you think about collected = collect(Char, itr) ? That would avoid if statement with the the all( isa) call, which requires an extra wipe through the data.
The call to collect guarantees an Array{Char,N} return value, where N == 1 if the iterator is 1-dimensional, N == 0, if the "iterator" is a number.

The String_iterator and call of IteratorSize would be avoided altogether by this:

String(itr) = String(collect(Char, itr))
String(x::AbstractArray{Char}) = throw(MethodError(String, (x, )))

[KlausC]

The name String_iterator does not follow the guidelines for Julia names. As you want to create an internal name (not exported), it could be _string_iterator, for example.

[vtjnash]

Let's just make this a concise one-liner, which is more efficient than your version too (since it needs to make fewer intermediate copies):

String(x) = sprint(join, x)

Suggested change

	- **String(x::AbstractIterator)**
	- Converts an iterator into a string.
	- Throws a `MethodError` if the iterator contains invalid data types (non-Char types) or if it is an infinite iterator.
	- Ensures that the result is a valid string representation composed solely of characters (`Char`).
	- **String(any_iterable)**
	- prints an iterable object into a string using `join`.

[jakobnissen]

But wait, do we want this? This has completely different semantics from the existing String function. For example, with this change we get:

julia> String(Int8[101, 102])
"101102"

julia> String(UInt8[101, 102])
"ef"

To me this seems like the wrong meaning of the type constructor String. This should only be used to convert things that are already a little bit 'string-like' and should not be conflated with print, which this implementation suggests.

[vtjnash]

Okay, that makes sense. This seems more like write then:

String(x) = sprint(io -> foreach(c -> write(io, c), x))

The print behavior was from looking at the implementation of String(::AbstractVector{<:AbstractChar}), but that probably also can also be calling write, since it is a case where print is defined to be a call to write.

[KlausC]

I don't think this is a good idea, Examples Char(0x2ee8) and String([0x2ee8]) should be consistent. Also the dependency on Litte/Big-Endiness is not expected.
I think the prototype should be like ... String(collect(Char, x)) as I mentioned before.

[Priynsh]

okay, so the problem with making just one liners is the error statements end up being loose for cyclic iterators, or even integers in some cases. So sticking with the ... String(collect(Char, x)) prototype.