Initial support for LLVM 20 #57352
Initial support for LLVM 20 #57352
Conversation
nsajko
added
upstream
Zentrik
force-pushed
the
llvm-20-initial
branch
from
81383ed to
c39401d
Compare
Zentrik
force-pushed
the
llvm-20-initial
branch
from
c39401d to
2aef440
Compare
…leSlotTracker (#100310)" llvm/llvm-project@9a25866
…EP call backs (#114547)" llvm/llvm-project@dc45ff1
…teSymbols.h header. NFC."
… methods (#102608)"
…ineModuleSlotTracker (#100310)"
… methods (#102608)"
…sertion methods (#102608)"
Zentrik
force-pushed
the
llvm-20-initial
branch
from
686ae06 to
b73126e
Compare
|
Is this PR good to go for the time being? Further improvements could be done in follow up PRs. |
Yes |
|
Does this include any of the fixes in #56130? My initial impression is that those are missing here |
No I don't think this includes any of them, do we want it to? |
Yeah, generally my strategy was always to merge the fixes ahead of time in seperate PRs, and then only have the "flip the switch" PR without any code changes. |
Is this in reference to adding llvm 19 or 20 support? This is what I intended for 19, but a bunch of issues only became apparent once we flipped the switch and I didn't think it was worth it to try and split those changes out. Anyways, the 19 pr should be merged in soon so moot point anyways. |
For LLVM 20, we still need to deal with #55844, #57021 and get the LLVM 19 PR in.