Work around LLVM JITLink stack overflow issue.

src/jitlayers.cpp

@@ -689,8 +689,17 @@ static void jl_compile_codeinst_now(jl_code_instance_t *codeinst)
             if (!decls.specFunctionObject.empty())
                 NewDefs.push_back(decls.specFunctionObject);
         }
-        auto Addrs = jl_ExecutionEngine->findSymbols(NewDefs);
-
+        // Split batches to avoid stack overflow in the JIT linker.
+        // FIXME: Patch ORCJITs InPlaceTaskDispatcher to not recurse on task dispatches but
+        // push the tasks to a queue to be drained later. This avoids the stackoverflow caused by recursion
+        // in the linker when compiling a large number of functions at once.
+        SmallVector<uint64_t, 0> Addrs;
+        for (size_t i = 0; i < NewDefs.size(); i += 1000) {
+            auto end = std::min(i + 1000, NewDefs.size());
+            SmallVector<StringRef> batch(NewDefs.begin() + i, NewDefs.begin() + end);
+            auto AddrsBatch = jl_ExecutionEngine->findSymbols(batch);
+            Addrs.append(AddrsBatch);
+        }
         size_t nextaddr = 0;
         for (auto &this_code : linkready) {
             auto it = invokenames.find(this_code);

test/cmdlineargs.jl

@@ -1268,3 +1268,6 @@ end
         end
     end
 end
+
+# https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/58229 Recursion in jitlinking with inline=no
+@test success(`$(Base.julia_cmd()) --inline=no -e 'Base.compilecache(Base.identify_package("Pkg"))'`)