Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update for ManifoldsBase 0.15 #33

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2023
Merged

Update for ManifoldsBase 0.15 #33

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2023

Conversation

mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member

@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran added preview docs Add this label if you want to see a PR-preview of the documentation Ready-for-Review labels Oct 16, 2023
@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

@kellertuer We can't get CI passing here without merging JuliaManifolds/Manifolds.jl#642 (comment) and tagging it, and we can't get CI passing there without merging and tagging this PR 😞 .

@kellertuer
Copy link
Member

I do not follow why that is the case, how did we manage to get this deadlock?
We should maybe avoid having this then? Are we using both in their tests?

If both work for you locally we could merge and register both.

@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

Manifolds.jl is a test dependency of ManifoldDiff.jl -- this is the issue. I will re-check tests here, I'm not sure if I tested it on the latest commit of 0.15.

@kellertuer
Copy link
Member

or to be more precise, I was hoping, Manifolds.jl works without Diff.

@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

ManifoldDiff.jl is a hard dependency of Manifolds.jl.

@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

ManifoldDiff.jl works locally, so I will merge and tag it.

@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran merged commit 9ad2c4a into main Oct 21, 2023
2 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
preview docs Add this label if you want to see a PR-preview of the documentation Ready-for-Review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants