Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Pfapack] Deal with different versions of libblastrampoline #4770

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2022

Conversation

giordano
Copy link
Member

CC: @xrq-phys. I hope this will work 🙂

@giordano giordano merged commit 1517f33 into JuliaPackaging:master Apr 16, 2022
@giordano giordano deleted the mg/pfpack branch April 16, 2022 17:14
@xrq-phys
Copy link
Contributor

xrq-phys commented Apr 17, 2022 via email

mkitti added a commit to mkitti/Yggdrasil that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2022
> Someone should do something like JuliaPackaging#4770 (for lack of better options at the moment)

I'm "someone".

https://discourse.julialang.org/t/too-many-julia-versions/84538/15?u=mkitti

1. Do we need a version bump to SLICOT 5.8.1 to do this?
2. @andreasvarga can we coordinate a SLICOT 5.8.1 release?

cc: @RalphAS
giordano pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2022
* SLICOT 5.8, Julia 1.8 compat

> Someone should do something like #4770 (for lack of better options at the moment)

I'm "someone".

https://discourse.julialang.org/t/too-many-julia-versions/84538/15?u=mkitti

1. Do we need a version bump to SLICOT 5.8.1 to do this?
2. andreasvarga can we coordinate a SLICOT 5.8.1 release?

cc: RalphAS

* Bump libblastrampoline_jll to 5.1.1+1, debug for Julia 1.8

* Add Julia 1.7 and 1.9 back

* Shove this package ver back to 5.8.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants