Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: ChainRules v0.7.36 #25905

Closed

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 082447d4-558c-5d27-93f4-14fc19e9eca2
Repo: https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl.git
Tree: e76c78e33cf790dd0dc05827e972a9d6e419c738

Registrator tree SHA: e934b8c55381f28735124f23e8f7e96d09b20416
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl Dec 6, 2020
* Move symmetric rules to own file

* Move symmetric tests to own file

* Increment version number
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2020

Your new version pull request does not meet the guidelines for auto-merging. Please make sure that you have read the General registry README. The following guidelines were not met:

  • Does not meet sequential version number guideline: version 0.7.36 skips over 0.7.35

Note that the guidelines are only required for the pull request to be merged automatically. However, it is strongly recommended to follow them, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.


If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

@giordano giordano closed this Dec 6, 2020
@giordano giordano deleted the registrator/chainrules/082447d4/v0.7.36 branch December 6, 2020 16:51
devmotion referenced this pull request in JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl Dec 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants