Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.4.1 -- Upgrade MUMPS_jll.jl #127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

amontoison
Copy link
Member

@amontoison amontoison commented Feb 5, 2024

I renamed the shared libraries in MUMPS_jll.jl when I compiled the release 5.6.2 such that they can coexist in the same environment than MUMPS_seq_jll.jl.
MUMPS_seq_jll.jl is a dependency of Ipopt.jl and the risk is quite high.

It also means that we can have both MUMPS_seq_jll.jl and MUMPS_jll.jl here now if we want.
Even if MUMPS_seq_jll.jl is sequential, I compiled it with LBT and not OpenBLAS.
The speed-up could be nice for small linear systems.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (37f17ac) 20.25% compared to head (746663d) 20.15%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #127      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.25%   20.15%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files           7        6       -1     
  Lines         780      779       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          158      157       -1     
  Misses        622      622              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@amontoison amontoison merged commit 8221614 into JuliaSmoothOptimizers:main Feb 5, 2024
17 of 21 checks passed
@amontoison amontoison deleted the release-5.6.2 branch February 5, 2024 05:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant