Remove dynamic call in check_args macro

[devmotion]

@oschulz This PR fixes your example in #1067 (comment) for me. More concretely, I get

julia> using Distributions, CUDA

julia> Mu = cu(rand(10));

julia> Sigma = cu(rand(10));

julia> D = Normal.(Mu, Sigma)
10-element CuArray{Normal{Float32}, 1, CUDA.Mem.DeviceBuffer}:
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.521244f0, σ=0.21886574f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.71777487f0, σ=0.7293551f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.9532782f0, σ=0.64151007f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.053326122f0, σ=0.9042364f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.7432136f0, σ=0.8857779f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.12811048f0, σ=0.61526275f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.25544932f0, σ=0.8564379f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.71731555f0, σ=0.57268643f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.17898592f0, σ=0.40761828f0)
 Normal{Float32}(μ=0.71395373f0, σ=0.39995775f0)

julia> X = cu(rand(10));

julia> logpdf.(D, X)
10-element CuArray{Float32, 1, CUDA.Mem.DeviceBuffer}:
 -0.26363182
 -0.6177307
 -0.52780163
 -0.8318763
 -0.980844
 -0.451747
 -0.9199794
 -0.5523126
 -0.7440649
 -0.033901572

I don't know how to test this without GPUs though... Maybe we should add some GPU-specific tests and run them with buildkite (I got help with setting it up for OptimalTransport.jl a while ago, so I could add a similar setup here)?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1491 (e98742a) into master (bdb44eb) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1491   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.42%   84.42%           
=======================================
  Files         124      124           
  Lines        7495     7495           
=======================================
  Hits         6328     6328           
  Misses       1167     1167           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/utils.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bdb44eb...e98742a. Read the comment docs.

[oschulz]

Thanks a lot @devmotion !

[devmotion]

This issue will also be fixed by the changes in #1492.

[devmotion]

I just confirmed that this was fixed by #1492 and the example works in the latest release of Distributions.

[oschulz]

Thanks @devmotion !