Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[syslog] enable/disable syslog rate limit feature in fixture #91

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Junchao-Mellanox
Copy link
Owner

@Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox commented Dec 7, 2023

Description of PR

Feature syslog rate limit has been disabled by default to avoid consume CPU cycles during warm / fast reboot. There are new CLIs to enable/disable it. The PR is to automatically enable it before syslog rate limit test and disable it after.

Summary:
In fixture "restore_rate_limit", enable the feature at beginning, disable the feature at the end.

Type of change

[ ] Bug fix
[ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
[x] Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

[ ] 201911
[ ] 202012
[ ] 202205
[x] 202305

Approach

In fixture "restore_rate_limit", enable the feature at beginning, disable the feature at the end.

What is the motivation for this PR?

Align test code with production code change

How did you do it?

In fixture "restore_rate_limit", enable the feature at beginning, disable the feature at the end.

How did you verify/test it?

Run test case on local setup, all passed

Any platform specific information?

N/A

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

N/A

Documentation

@Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox changed the title [syslog] enable/disable syslog rate limit feature in fixture Change-Id: I61545db602d579fa0f337686427235c6d04998c7 [syslog] enable/disable syslog rate limit feature in fixture Dec 7, 2023
Change-Id: I61545db602d579fa0f337686427235c6d04998c7
@Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox deleted the master-en-syslog branch January 18, 2024 01:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants