Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove downsides from subcontractors, buff research rate modifiers #2429

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 1, 2024

Conversation

NovemberOrWhatever
Copy link
Contributor

Players will still have to pick carefully due to only having two subcontractor slots, but this removes the downsides from these less influential leaders, and should hopefully make the capitalist ones more practical. Feedback welcome

Players will still have to pick carefully due to only having two subcontractor slots, but this removes the downsides from these less influential leaders, and should hopefully make the capitalist ones more practical. Feedback welcome
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 31, 2024

Download the artifacts for this pull request:

@@ -221,37 +149,13 @@ STRATEGY
name = ResearchRateModifier //TODO: should be a integration speed buff to staged combustion
//TODO: leaving this like this now until I can target SC parts
effectTitle = Jet Engine Proficiency
multiplier = 1.1
multiplier = 1.05
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe instead of lowering the multiplier, we should bring all of them to +10%?

1.1 for common research line, 1.15 for niche
@siimav siimav changed the title Remove downsides from subcontractors Remove downsides from subcontractors, buff research rate modifiers Sep 1, 2024
@siimav siimav merged commit 5eb7401 into master Sep 1, 2024
3 checks passed
@siimav siimav deleted the NoDownsideToSubcontracting branch September 1, 2024 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants