-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check radicals, strokes against KanjiDic/Unihan #287
Comments
Report so far: The element 白 is completely missing on the group of radicals for many, perhaps all cases. For example 皖 has the radical group correct but without any element. Some radicals in KanjiVG differ from both Kanjidic and Wiktionary, for example:
Most of the above seem most likely to be errors in KanjiVG, they don't seem to obey the rule of left/top first and the obvious radical is skipped over. On the other hand, some of Kanjidic's radicals don't agree with Wiktionary and KanjiVG:
Some but not all cases with element 月 are missing a kvg:original field of 肉 The element 日 is used for radical 73, but where this is used kvg:original field of 曰 should be added too. |
I'm getting a bit stuck on some of the Nelson radicals. For example,
The Nelson radical is supposedly 7, but that is ニ, which doesn't appear in any form in the character. I might have to borrow Nelson from the library or something to check the rest of these. Lots more weirdness like this:
The tradit radical is 59 which is 彡, which makes sense, but Nelson is 4 which is 丿, which doesn't really make much sense to me, since characters are full of these shapes of strokes. Another possibility is that, since these are the values in Kanjidic, the cause might be errors in Kanjidic. |
The nub of things which I'm stuck on from KanjiVG/Kanjidic is
The top case is the ニ (7) mentioned above where it does not exist in the character. The second case is a difference between 土 (32) and 士 (33) which makes no sense to me since the top part is visually clearly 士. The next three cases are where Nelson seems to use a dash (4), but since the Nelson radical is not indicated in the file it's not clear which of the various strokes should be the "dash". Assuming that Kanjidic is correct, Nelson's choice of using a dash as a radical is a very dubious one. |
Most of the work is done so I'll close this and leave it for later reference. |
For all characters, check whether a radical exists in the data.
Where KanjiDic has an entry for a character:
Where KanjiDic doesn't have an entry, check against the Unihan entry (this doesn't contain Nelson information).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: