Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade to parity 2.2.7 #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2019
Merged

upgrade to parity 2.2.7 #3

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2019

Conversation

epheph
Copy link
Contributor

@epheph epheph commented Jan 20, 2019

No description provided.

@epheph epheph requested a review from MicahZoltu January 20, 2019 22:58
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
FROM parity/parity:v1.11.1
FROM parity/parity:v2.2.7
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is a lot of new numbers... we are so far behind.

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
"eip161dTransition": "0x0",
"eip155Transition": "0x0",
"eip98Transition": "0x7fffffffffffff",
"eip86Transition": "0x7fffffffffffff",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why has EIP 86 been removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TL;DR: will take your word for it that it is a reasonable change.

@epheph epheph merged commit c276165 into master Jan 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants