-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for interfaces, part 4: getter methods #57
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
43f9102
Add support for interfaces, part 4: getter methods
benjaminjkraft 81f345e
Skip a test on Go 1.13 where gofmt disagrees about formatting
benjaminjkraft 85f0eeb
Skip both problematic tests, and do it properly this time
benjaminjkraft b8b66f5
Add getter-based assertions to pointer test (after rebase)
benjaminjkraft File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
92 changes: 90 additions & 2 deletions
92
.../testdata/snapshots/TestGenerate-InterfaceListField.graphql-InterfaceListField.graphql.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
110 changes: 108 additions & 2 deletions
110
...rate-InterfaceListOfListsOfListsField.graphql-InterfaceListOfListsOfListsField.graphql.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we discovered with the validator edge case, a union doesn't have shared fields, but it may be possible to treat the fields as shared if all the union members implement the same interface corresponding to a fragment. Anyway, this will be tackled in the upcoming fragment changes (if we want to tackle it at all).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yeah that's an interesting situation, and maybe a place where abstract-in-abstract spreads are more useful. Anyway, this is gonna get rewritten as you say.