Fix: Call to erase_if is ambiguous with C++20

util/device_set.cpp

@@ -48,15 +48,17 @@ void device_set::intersect(const device_set& other) {
  const auto& device = *it;
  return other.m_devices.find(device) == other.m_devices.end();
  };
- erase_if(m_devices, condition);
+ // must explicitly specify namespace `util` to avoid ambiguity with
+ // std::erase_if when compiling for C++20
+ util::erase_if(m_devices, condition);
 }
 
 void device_set::removeDevsWith(sycl::aspect aspect) {
  auto condition = [&](const StorageType::iterator& it) {
  const auto& device = *it;
  return device.has(aspect);
  };
- erase_if(m_devices, condition);
+ util::erase_if(m_devices, condition);
 }
 
 void device_set::removeDevsWith(std::initializer_list<sycl::aspect> aspects) {
@@ -70,15 +72,15 @@ void device_set::removeDevsWithout(sycl::aspect aspect) {
  const auto& device = *it;
  return !device.has(aspect);
  };
- erase_if(m_devices, condition);
+ util::erase_if(m_devices, condition);
 }
 
 void device_set::removeDevsWithout(const kernel_restrictions& restriction) {
  auto condition = [&](const StorageType::iterator& it) {
  const auto& device = *it;
  return !restriction.is_compatible(device);
  };
- erase_if(m_devices, condition);
+ util::erase_if(m_devices, condition);
 }
 
 device_set device_set::filtered(const device_set& other, sycl::aspect aspect) {