JOINT_MATRIX or JOINTMATRIX?

[pjcozzi]

The naming convention for JOINT_MATRIX is inconsistent with the rest of the uniform semantics in #83. However, they are inconsistent with WebGL naming conventions, e.g., FLOAT_VEC3.

We can:

• Do nothing.
• Change JOINT_MATRIX to JOINTMATRIX`.
• Change the other semantics, e.g., MODELVIEWPROJECTION to MODEL_VIEW_PROJECTION

Perhaps the last option is best.

[fabrobinet]

another option is just JOINT (since you know the type in the param)

[pjcozzi]

another option is just JOINT (since you know the type in the param)

This is also OK with me, but the question still remains for names of semantics, e.g., MODELVIEWPROJECTION vs. MODEL_VIEW_PROJECTION.

[fabrobinet]

I personally prefer MODELVIEWPROJECTION maybe because of the precedent in GL which was GL_MODELVIEW and not GL_MODEL_VIEW - So I am more used to it, but not feeling too strongly about it either...

[pjcozzi]

I am OK with keeping no underscores (e.g., MODELVIEWPROJECTION) and renaming JOINT_MATRIX to JOINTMATRIX (there is already a JOINT attribute).

@fabrobinet do you agree? If so I will update the schema for JOINTMATRIX.

[fabrobinet]

I agree. consistency first no underscores.... + flagged for converter

[pjcozzi]

Schema is updated. b20d1cf

[pjcozzi]

The schema and the converter are updated.