Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CI: Test and ensure spinoso-time still works #95

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

CI: Test and ensure spinoso-time still works #95

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Kijewski
Copy link
Owner

@Kijewski Kijewski commented Aug 2, 2022

No description provided.

@Kijewski Kijewski changed the base branch from main to v0.4.x August 2, 2022 12:20
@Kijewski Kijewski mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2022
Merged
Kijewski added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
@Kijewski
Rollup of #94, #92, #95 and #93
c57697d 
Rollup of

* Increase MSRV to 1.60 #94
* Upgrade phf and phf_shared to 0.11.0 #92
* CI: Test and ensure spinoso-time still works #95
* Update tz-rs dependency declaration to use no default features #93
@Kijewski
Copy link
Owner Author

Kijewski commented Aug 2, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Merged in #96.

@Kijewski Kijewski closed this Aug 2, 2022
@Kijewski Kijewski deleted the pr-artichoke branch August 2, 2022 14:17
@lopopolo
Copy link
Contributor

lopopolo commented Aug 2, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Am I going to break your build if I bump spinoso-time to 0.6.0? Do you also want a git ref in this dep?

@Kijewski
Copy link
Owner Author

Kijewski commented Aug 2, 2022

I don't think we need to worry about that. The cron job will tell me if the the build fails, e.g. because you bumped the version number. Then I will update the test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Kijewski @lopopolo