-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KBS24-1 - Click coupling of bis-propargyl diaminohexane and azidomethylferrocene #44
Comments
Amounts:
Checked azide was OK before using - see NMRs. |
25.10.22Sparged water and THF. Added copper sulfate pentahydrate (10.0 mg) and sodium ascorbate (23.2 mg) to flask, evacuated and backfilled with N2 three times. Added sparged water (2 mL). Added azidomethylferrocene (58.2 mg, 0.241 mmol, 2.3 equiv.) and bis-propargyl diaminohexane (42 mg, 0.107 mmol), each dissolved in 1 mL sparged THF. Initially the reaction mixture settled into two layers - mostly green with a ring of orange on top. Adding 1 mL water increased the amount of green, adding 3 mL THF reduced the ring of orange. Left stirring from 6pm. |
26.10.22TLC'd at 12 pm. Appears to show that while starting material is consumed, there is a mixture of mono and bis click products. SM = azidomethylferrocene LRMSKBS24-1 RM 26-10-22.pdf Peaks indicate formation of mono click product (656.30, [M+Na]) and bis click product (897.34, [M+Na]). Small amounts of boc-protected amine and bis propargyl amine present (339, 415). Unsure about 495, 510, 41, 822, 1021 peaks. Worked up at 4.30 pm - removed THF by rotary evaporation, extracted with DCM (4 x 5 mL) and washed with brine (20 mL). Left in conical over long weekend. |
31.10.22Dried over MgSO4 and rotovapped down. Empty vial: 15.7889 LRMSKBS24-1 cr.pdf Peak at 897.32 [M+H]. Unsure what peaks at 959.45, 981.42 and 1021.33 represent - 1021 was also seen in reaction mixture earlier, but other two were not. H NMRKBS24-1 cr_1.zip Initial analysis indicates product has formed - boc peaks at 1.44, ferrocene peaks around 4.14 - 4.40. |
09.11.22Column conditionsPooled fractions 5-7 to give a bright yellow coloured liquid. Rotovapped down. Empty vial: 15.7074 H NMRKBS24-1 F5-7_1.zip 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (2H), 5.25 (4H), 4.39 (4H), 4.15-4.24 (18H), 3.18 (4H), 1.53 (2H), 1.43 (4H), 1.40 (18H), 1.19 (4H). Partial assignment (using numbers from MestreNova prediction): δ 7.49 (triazole, 11 & 17), 5.25 (methylene, 34 & 48), 4.39 (methylene, 9 & 15), 4.15-4.24 (ferrocene, varied), 3.18 (hexane), 1.53 (hexane), 1.43 (hexane), 1.40 (boc groups), 1.19 (hexane). LRMSKBS24-1 09-11-22.pdf Peak at 897.34 [M+Na]. Can see minor peak at 655 (indicates mono click coupling product). |
10.11.222Isolated other fractions that had spots on TLC and NMR'd. KBS24-1 F2-4, F8.pdf Cannot identify compound in F2-4. F8 appears to be just solvent + impurities. |
FTIR |
HRMS20221130_Service_HiRes_ESI_000017-full.pdf 20221130_Service_HiRes_ESI_000017.pdf HiRes ESI MeOH pos [M+Na]+ 0.2 ppm |
Link to HIRAC, original method and [master page].
KBS24 Linear amine click coupling with azidomethylferrocene.docx
Reaction scheme
Outcome
62.1 mg (0.071 mmol), 70%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: