Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their payment #2249

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

shamardy
Copy link
Collaborator

@shamardy shamardy commented Oct 22, 2024

To Test:
Nothing as swaps should work as normal after this. This invalidates the fix of this issue #1442 and I will work on a better solution for this where taker rebroadcast thier transaction if it's not on chain.

@shamardy shamardy added the in progress Changes will be made from the author label Oct 22, 2024
@shamardy shamardy changed the title fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their own payment fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their payment Oct 22, 2024
…d_impl` to handle mempool propagation delays
@shamardy shamardy added under review and removed in progress Changes will be made from the author labels Oct 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@mariocynicys mariocynicys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@shamardy shamardy merged commit 1ebdbf7 into dev Nov 1, 2024
22 of 25 checks passed
@shamardy shamardy deleted the remove-taker-conf branch November 1, 2024 15:31
dimxy added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
* dev:
  fix(legacy-swap): check for confirmations on recover taker (#2242)
  fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their payment (#2249)
  refactor(P2P): types and modules (#2256)
  fix(evm): correctly display eth addr in iguana v2 activation result (#2254)
  feat(utxo): prioritize electrum connections (#1966)
  refactor(SwapOps): make all methods async (#2251)
  refactor(SwapOps): make `send_maker_payment` async (#2250)
  remove old p2p implementation (#2248)
dimxy added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
* dev:
  fix(nft): add token_id field to the tx history primary key, fix balance (#2209)
  feat(cosmos): support IBC types in tx history implementation (#2245)
  fix(hd-wallet): use `CoinBalanceMap` for UTXO and QTUM (#2259)
  fix(tests): add more sepolia endpoints in tests (#2262)
  fix(legacy-swap): check for confirmations on recover taker (#2242)
  fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their payment (#2249)
  refactor(P2P): types and modules (#2256)
  fix(evm): correctly display eth addr in iguana v2 activation result (#2254)
  feat(utxo): prioritize electrum connections (#1966)
  refactor(SwapOps): make all methods async (#2251)
  refactor(SwapOps): make `send_maker_payment` async (#2250)
  remove old p2p implementation (#2248)
dimxy added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
* dev:
  fix(foot-shooting): remove leftover code that panics via RPC (#2270)
  refactor(MarketCoinOps): make `wait_for_htlc_tx_spend` async (#2265)
  feat(eth-swap): maker tpu v2 implementation (#2211)
  fix(nft): add token_id field to the tx history primary key, fix balance (#2209)
  feat(cosmos): support IBC types in tx history implementation (#2245)
  fix(hd-wallet): use `CoinBalanceMap` for UTXO and QTUM (#2259)
  fix(tests): add more sepolia endpoints in tests (#2262)
  fix(legacy-swap): check for confirmations on recover taker (#2242)
  fix(legacy-swap): remove the need for takers to confirm their payment (#2249)
  refactor(P2P): types and modules (#2256)
  fix(evm): correctly display eth addr in iguana v2 activation result (#2254)
  feat(utxo): prioritize electrum connections (#1966)
  refactor(SwapOps): make all methods async (#2251)
  refactor(SwapOps): make `send_maker_payment` async (#2250)
  remove old p2p implementation (#2248)
  feat(cosmos-offline-tests): prepare IBC channels inside the container  (#2246)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants