Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.3.2 #1696

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 12, 2021
Merged

Release 1.3.2 #1696

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 12, 2021

Conversation

rainest
Copy link
Contributor

@rainest rainest commented Aug 11, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
Releases 1.3.2. Primary motivator was #1691. We need to run through a backport (sorta--2.0.0 isn't actually out yet) release. Also bumps to Kong 2.5 because may as well.

Special notes for your reviewer:
We have not previously done any releases from version branches. This may not work. We need to confirm CI results and address any issues after pushing the tag.

We don't yet have a procedure for updating content in main when changes occur in other branches but only main matters. Here, the changelog and single manifests need to be in main. I've set up the commits so that cherry-picking should be an option after. Changes to the internals (the manifest sources and Makefile) can be left on this branch alone.

Copy link
Contributor

@mflendrich mflendrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code change LGTM.

We don't yet have a procedure for updating content in main when changes occur in other branches but only main matters

A way of solving this that's most natural to me is:

  1. fixing the bug in main
  2. backporting the bugfix into old release branches

That would be the other way around than we did in this PR, but that's nothing wrong - at most, unorthodox for the "canonical" master development or gitflow models. I don't understand the only main matters part of the comment, though.

Organizing the commits so that they should be cherrypickable sounds great. Could you please ensure that the fix gets ported to main? Either by opening a PR, or at least an issue in the 2.0 GA blocker milestone. Thanks.

@ccfishk ccfishk merged commit c85dbe0 into 1.3.x Aug 12, 2021
@ccfishk ccfishk deleted the release/1.3.2 branch August 12, 2021 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants