-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is loading #284
Is loading #284
Conversation
@ivos is this still relevant after the Vue 2.7 upgrade? I'm guessing it will need some modifications if it's still something you're interested in adding |
@adamdehaven Not sure how does this PR relate to upgrade of Vue on the |
Me looking at the wrong base branch 😅 |
Ahh, I was missing the fact that the So now what? Should I create this PR once again, this time against the |
I read through the thread on #208 and it mostly makes sense, although I need to play with the Code Sandbox a little to get my head around what is being suggested. If you think this is worth pursuing and would like to put up a PR against the master branch I can take a look in the next couple weeks. (Admittedly, I haven’t parsed through all of the open Issues/PRs yet) |
Just a short recap. The docs here https://docs-swrv.netlify.app/configuration.html states that "Return value The above statement is not true. When you switch from key value 1 to key value 2, swrv starts loading data for key value 2 but the What's more, there's even no way to find out that this is happening. This PR tries to enable a way for the client to find out as specified here: #208 (comment). |
My concern here is that a new return value of |
Yep. I fully understand your concern. That's why I was trying to elicit some feedback in the #208 ticket.
I do admit that there might be a better name for I've chosen |
Going back to your original question, if it's not too much effort, would you want to create a new PR against |
Ok, will do. Thanks. |
PR for #208
Comments:
isLoading
=false
are not covered by tests. I haven't found any test cases that would cover that forisValidating
which I could extend. These are is a separate (second) commit.