Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update default catalog list #325

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2019
Merged

Conversation

yymao
Copy link
Member

@yymao yymao commented Jun 11, 2019

There is an option that can be specified in the catalog config to determine whether the catalog in consideration will show up when an user runs GCRCatalogs.get_available_catalog(), or only show up when the user runs GCRCatalogs.get_available_catalog(include_default_only=False).

The reason for this difference is that the number of catalogs is large, and most catalogs are not interesting for end users.

This option was named included_by_default, but it is not clear to most people what this option means, so it was later renamed to include_in_default_catalog_list. However, it seems that people have not been using the new name. This PR makes this change once and for all. This PR also selects fewer "default catalogs".

@yymao yymao added register Issues related to the register module configs Issues related to catalog config yaml files labels Jun 11, 2019
@yymao yymao requested a review from wmwv June 11, 2019 18:51
Copy link
Contributor

@wmwv wmwv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yymao yymao merged commit 94a2047 into master Jun 11, 2019
@yymao yymao deleted the u/yymao/update-default-catalog-list branch June 11, 2019 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
configs Issues related to catalog config yaml files register Issues related to the register module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants