-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
diffusion_validation
During the propagation of electrons inside the silicon, they are repeatedly scattered that leads to their displacement in the pixel plane.
Craig Lage, Andrei Nomerotski/SAWG
Description of theoretical model used to estimate electron diffusion amplitude is given in Craig Lage' document on Poisson_CCD22 low-level simulator. Discussion of whether this model properly describes the diffusion of Fe66 hits seen in the experiments is presented in the following talks by Sergey Karpov - 1, 2 and by Craig Lage - 3.
Also some information, including previous efforts of measuring voltage dependency of diffusion, is available in the Andy Rasmussen article 4
Data for validation are taken from the following sensors tested at BNL under different bias voltages:
- ITL-3800C-092
- ITL-3800C-095
- ITL-3800C-307
- E2V-CCD250-107
The amount of diffusion to apply was defined in GalSim:galsim/sensor.py, inside _calculate_diff_step function. Before Aug 8, 2018, it was defined as
# 0.026 is kT/q at room temp (298 K)
diff_step = np.sqrt(2 * 0.026 * CCDTemperature / 298.0 / Vdiff) * SensorThickness
It implemented the diffusion model explained in detail in Appendix E of this document.
This model is known to underestimate the diffusion by ~2 times in respect to experimental data on Fe55 hits, so the use of an effective electron mass correction from Green (1989) has been proposed by Craig Lage.
Since Aug 8, it is implemented as:
# Set up the diffusion step size at the operating temperature
# First, calculate the approximate front side voltage
VChannelStop = qfh # near zero
VCollect = Vparallel_hi + 12.0 # Estimate from simulation
VBarrier = Vparallel_lo + 15.0 # Estimate from simulation
ChannelStopRegionWidth = 2.0 * (ChannelStopWidth / 2.0 + FieldOxideTaper)
ChannelStopRegionArea = ChannelStopRegionWidth * PixelSize
CollectArea = (PixelSize - ChannelStopRegionWidth) * PixelSize * CollectingPhases / NumPhases
BarrierArea = (PixelSize - ChannelStopRegionWidth) * PixelSize * (NumPhases - CollectingPhases) / NumPhases
Vfront = (ChannelStopRegionArea * VChannelStop + CollectArea * VCollect + BarrierArea * VBarrier) / (PixelSize**2)
# Then, the total voltage across the silicon
Vdiff = max(Vfront - Vbb, 1.0) # This just makes sure that Vdiff is always > 1.0V
MobilityFactor = 0.27 # This is the factor from Green et.al.
# 0.026 is kT/q at room temp (298 K)
diff_step = np.sqrt(2 * 0.026 * CCDTemperature / 298.0 / Vdiff / MobilityFactor) * SensorThickness
This implements both the effective mass correction (through MobilityFactor multiplier), and the adjustments for Vfront front voltage based on simulations using the peak voltage at ~1 um above the bottom.
The diff_step value computed above describes the diffusion for outer surface electron conversion. If the electron is generated at some depth inside the silicon, the value is scaled down as
diffusion = diff_step * sqrt(1 - ConversionDepth/SensorThickness)
This is done inside Silicon::accumulate() method of GalSim Silicon.cpp.
The amount of diffusion under different experimental setups is measured by fitting the Fe55 hit marks in acquired images with Gaussian model using NGMIX code by Erin Sheldon. The validity of fitting procedure for significantly undersampled case of Fe55 hits has been specifically studied by generating and pixelizing the clouds of electrons with different sizes and sub-pixel center positions, fitting them in the same way as Fe55 hits, and then comparing the results with original sizes. The procedure has been found to be unbiased in the parameter region of interest for Fe55 fitting, and therefore applicable for the validation.
The following distributions have been obtained for the sizes of Fe55 hits (selecting only the events corresponding to main Kalpha intensity peak) under different bias voltages on different CCDs:
The following table summarizes these distributions in terms of median (which corresponds to the ~28 um mean conversion depth of Fe55 x-ray photons in silicon) and surface conversion diffusion values:
Voltage, V | Run Number | Sensor | Median diffusion, um | Surface conversion diffusion, um |
---|---|---|---|---|
15.7 | 8246 | ITL-3800C-307 | 6.3 | 6.66 |
22.2 | 4863 | ITL-3800C-092 | 4.95 | 5.47 |
35 | 4879 | ITL-3800C-092 | 4.48 | 4.95 |
50 | 4951 | ITL-3800C-095 | 3.83 | 4.27 |
70 | 2374 | E2V-CCD250-107 | 3.41 | 3.85 |
The latter is derived from fitting the distributions with the model consisting of exponentially distributed conversion depth and gaussian scatter of measured sigmas. Details of the fits are shown here
Lowest and highest voltages fits are probably not completely reliable as the histograms deviate from expected shape. All other voltages are described quite well by such simple model.
Moreover, the data on surface conversion diffusion acquired earlier and published in Rasmussen et al (2014) are also used for qualitative validation.
Since Aug 8, 2018 GalSim uses the diffusion model that is mostly consistent with the Fe55 results shown above.
Small discrepancy is seen for lower voltages and is most probably related to unoptimal Vfront adjustment.
Camera
07/20/18 - Initial Version - Sergey Karpov
08/08/18 - Update for a new diffusion model committed by Craig Lage - Sergey Karpov