[Suggestion] Revert "Align widget padding to icons" #4879
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 93cb189.
Description
Following the introduction of this commit, the appearance of the widgets has been modified in terms of width, and they now occupy a much smaller portion of the screen.
As a result, some widgets have significantly lost readability, and there is now too much unused space around them.
Here is an example before the introduction of this commit:
And an example after the introduction of this commit:
As you can see, the available space for the text inside the widgets is much more limited than before. This is particularly problematic for certain widgets like calendars or task lists.
I suggest reverting to the previous layout or allowing the margin to be configurable.
Type of change
✅ General change (non-breaking change that doesn't fit the below categories like copyediting)
❌ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
❌ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)