-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing Framework #1
Comments
I would be willing to write some tests as well. Karma will let you test in many different browsers easily which I'm expecting to be important on a project like this. |
I don't mind Karma, I just hate configuring it. You want to pick up that part? |
sure thing, karma works great with mocha too, wanna use that instead of Jasmine? |
Yeah. I like Mocha more than Jasmine. But either way works. I've used them all at some point. The syntax will basically be the same. |
there ya go... |
Would be nice to setup TravisCI as well.. |
You guys rock, thanks! |
👍 for sure, would be nice to see that tests are passing on pull requests. |
Hmm, anyone has any idea why Travis doesn't seem to be working? I activated this repo on travis-ci.org, I added a .travis.yml file, nothing… What did I forget? |
@LeaVerou I'm wondering if it's because there's nothing in the master branch. Could be that we need to tell Travis that we're not using master somehow? |
Try something like?
|
Ah. Here we go. Seems like this is the official answer. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12878568/travis-ci-triggers-build-only-for-master-branch-in-github-repo |
Ok. We have builds and a testing framework. Closing this out. We should probably make individual issues for needed tests. |
So I'll help write tests. Anyone have an opinion on what they'd like to use? I thought the simplest thing might be Mocha/BDD/JSDOM.
Thoughts. Votes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: