Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-json to v1.7.0 #1558

Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-json 1.6.3 -> 1.7.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization (org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-json)

v1.7.0

==================

This release contains all of the changes from 1.7.0-RC and is compatible with Kotlin 2.0.
Please note that for reasons explained in the 1.7.0-RC changelog, it may not be possible to use it with the Kotlin 1.9.x
compiler plugin. Yet, it is still fully backwards compatible with previous versions.

The only difference with 1.7.0-RC is that classDiscriminatorMode property in JsonBuilder is marked as experimental,
as it should have been when it was introduced (#​2680).


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from dessalines and MV-GH as code owners June 19, 2024 04:08
@dessalines dessalines merged commit 1649600 into main Jun 19, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant