Clarify issues links in CONTRIBUTING.md

[JCSzamosi]

This pull request is being submitted to all repos that have been converted to Workbench, so that they reflect a recent update in the Workbench template. The change is probably appropriate for your repository, but you may disagree. I encourage you to look at a description of the problem it fixes found in this comment of this issue.

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/LibraryCarpentry/lc-open-refine/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-288

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2023-06-13 09:03:59 +0000

[jas58]

I think @ostephens made this update locally with 285 and #286. The order seems reversed, but perhaps not important.
I'm not sure about the link or text "included below"--Would a youtube link like Midwest Big Data Hub's be less intimidating? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpEWDg8AbPc

[ostephens]

@jas58 @JCSzamosi the changes I made were in line with the original issue but these changes go a bit further to:

• link directly to the repository issues where the instruction is to create/view issues
• Add a link to all open issues across the carpentries

I complete agree that the "included below" text and link not great - but they haven't changed in this PR so need a separate issue if we are going to change them. This text and link seems to be standard across the carpentries so might need some wider discussion. @tobyhodges might be able to comment on this