Removing numpy package from src/lightning

[Bhavay-2001]

What does this PR do?

Fixes #16649

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/agreed via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
• Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
• Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
• Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
• Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Tagging @awaelchli for better visibility.

Before you start reviewing, make sure you have read the review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

Reviewer checklist

• Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
• Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
• Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
• Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pytorch-lightning--19959.org.readthedocs.build/en/19959/

[Bhavay-2001]

Hi @awaelchli,
I am trying to change the numpy package in this piece of code in the src\lightning\fabric\utilities\logger.py

if isinstance(params[k], (np.bool_, np.integer, np.floating)):
    params[k] = params[k].item()
elif type(params[k]) not in [bool, int, float, str, Tensor]:
    params[k] = str(params[k])

I tried to change np.bool_ to torch.bool but it is giving an error saying torch.bool is not a type.
Could you pls suggest what I am doing wrong here?

[lantiga]

torch.bool is actually an instance of torch.dtype

>>> type(torch.bool)
<class 'torch.dtype'>

so you need to check if something.dtype == torch.bool

[awaelchli]

Superseded by #20055, which needed a different approach. #16649 is now completed, thanks for the help!